1. The relative molecular mass of fulvic acid minerals (FA) is small, and the relative molecular mass can only reach 2000, which is easy to be absorbed and utilized by animals, but the relative molecular mass of humic acid minerals can reach 300,000;
2. FA has a high content of functional groups, especially carboxyl groups in oxygen-containing functional groups, which have high physiological activity;
3. FA can be directly dissolved in water, and its water solubility is acidic, while HA is insoluble in water and needs to be converted into metal salt (such as sodium humate) or ammonium salt to dissolve in water;
4. The element composition is different, the C of FA is about 45%, O is about 48%; the C of HA is about 62%, and O is about 30%.
HA has better astringent, adsorption and anti-inflammatory effects in animals, and FA has a better absorption effect in animals. For this reason, not all FA is better for animal feed-grade sodium humate raw materials. The two should be combined to work together and exert their respective advantages to achieve the best feeding effect. At the same time, it will save costs.
Of course, whether it is fulvic acid minerals or humic acid minerals, for animals, the level of water-insoluble matter directly determines the quality of the product. Because, according to many sodium humate extraction processes and residues, insolubles include not only silicate, but also residual coal, pitch, wax and resin, and lignin derivatives. These substances enter the animal’s body and accumulate over time, which will have a great impact on the animal’s digestive system.
Come to our Alibaba store to buy the product from the humic acid manufacturer : Humic acid minerals and fulvic acid minerals